Medication Math: The most dangerous skill we don’t practice enough as EMS Providers.

Medication math represents a critical safety vulnerability in EMS, with 28-35% of prehospital pediatric medication administrations containing dosing errors despite implementation of dosing reference aids.[1-2] Among practicing paramedics, mean performance on drug calculation examinations is only 51.4%, with conceptual errors (incorrect problem setup) more prevalent than mathematical errors.[3]

The prehospital environment creates unique challenges that amplify calculation risks. Paramedics have limited exposure to critically ill children (pediatric cases represent only ~7% of EMS calls), face extreme time pressure and emotional stress, and must perform weight-based calculations for each individual child without the safety barriers present in hospitals.[4] The need to dilute medications to different concentrations and transfer doses from pre-loaded syringes using stopcocks introduces additional complexity where errors frequently occur.[5]

Specific high-risk medications demonstrate alarming error rates. 

Epinephrine shows incorrect dosing in 29-68% of administrations (including 10-fold overdoses with mean errors of 808% of the intended dose), intranasal and intravenous fentanyl in 68.5-68.8% of cases, and midazolam in 36.8-54% of administrations.[2][4-5] Dextrose 50% and glucagon each show 75% error rates.[2]

The problem stems from multiple calculation-related failures. Incorrect weight estimation contributes to 12.7% of dosing errors, with patient age-based estimation producing more errors than Broselow-Luten tape or asking parents.[6] However, even when weight is correct, improper drug dilution accounts for 31.6% of errors, and conceptual errors represent 48.5% of all mistakes among paramedic students—indicating fundamental mathematical understanding deficits rather than simple arithmetic failures.[1][7]

Practice opportunities are severely limited.

Paramedics report infrequent performance of drug calculations in daily practice and rare inclusion of medication math in continuing education programs.[3] Unlike hospital settings with pharmacist verification and double-checking protocols, EMS providers work with minimal safety barriers, making individual calculation competency essential yet underdeveloped.[8-9]

 

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2025. Harmer BM, Hoyle JD, Edwards A, et al.New

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2023. Kazi R, Hoyle JD, Huffman C, et al.

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2000. Hubble MW, Paschal KR, Sanders TA.

JAMA Network Open. 2021. Siebert JN, Bloudeau L, Combescure C, et al.

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2019. Hoyle JD, Ekblad G, Hover T, et al.

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2021. Hoyle JD, Ekblad G, Woodwyk A, et al.

Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ. 2013. Eastwood K, Boyle MJ, Williams B.

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2020. Cicero MX, Adelgais K, Hoyle JD, et al.

Prehospital Emergency Care. 2022. Walker D, Moloney C, SueSee B, et al.